# Faultprint External Verification Packet v14 001

## Purpose

This packet rechecks the same 78-row validation frame against the v14 full-baseline calibration.

v14 applied rule-consistency fixes for null rows, low-resemblance gates, and boundary hygiene, then reran the audit with zero detected issues.

## Files

- Sample CSV: FAULTPRINT_EXTERNAL_VERIFICATION_PACKET_V14_SAMPLE_001.csv
- v14 calibration summary: FAULTPRINT_V14_FULL_BASELINE_CALIBRATION_SUMMARY_001.md
- v14 consistency audit: FAULTPRINT_V14_FULL_BASELINE_CONSISTENCY_AUDIT_001.md
- Full v14 crosswalk: FAULTPRINT_OPERATING_POSTMORTEM_CROSSWALK_014.csv
- Full v14 eligibility table: FAULTPRINT_CLIENT_OUTPUT_ELIGIBILITY_012.csv

Rows in this sample: 78

Status counts:
- client_ready: 10
- client_ready_with_caveat: 49
- hold_internal: 15
- revise_internal: 4

## Reviewer Questions

1. Does the evidence anchor appear supported by the named source/document?
2. Is the primary pathology the narrowest defensible label?
3. Is the resemblance band justified by the stated support level and source quality?
4. Is the client-output status appropriate?
5. Is the allowed claim bounded, falsifiable, and non-predictive?
6. Does the boundary field state what the row does not prove?
7. What exact change should be made if the row does not pass?